The best parts of geek culture… in one BEAST!

Are Video Games Getting Boring?

Skyrim is Boring

Let’s have a chat, gaming community.

I wanted to follow up on one of the more recent articles on the site, about the top ten gaming trends that need to die. I have my own opinion on something that needs to die in gaming in general.

Convenience.

You see, convenience has been around since gaming began back in the 70′s. A hero. A protagonist. YOU are the person that furthers the story, and things happen solely because YOU are the person making them happen.

Let’s take a look at Skyrim, for example. Will the Stormcloaks and Imperials strike a truce without you? Will any dragons die without you using your attacks? Will quests be fulfilled, will the main story progress, will anyone get a single thing done without your assistance? Seemingly, every person in the world of Tamriel is a lazy ass who can’t be bothered to do the smallest task, and instead puts it on your hands. There’s something seriously wrong with this. Can you see it? Nothing happens around you, as much as the world seems very much alive. This is a growing problem in my opinion, and something that truly needs to be altered.

Halo is Boring

Only YOU can press the button, hero!

I seriously dislike how convenient game stories have become. The world of a game, from beginning to end, is built around you. The universe orbits you; you are it’s very epicenter. Running through decrepit ruins, thousands of years old? They’re somehow going to start collapsing when you’re in them, the exact moment you’re trying to escape. What’s that, a waterfall you’re drifting down? Don’t worry, the bottom has most likely become deep enough for you to survive, with no sign of a sharp rock that would, in reality, kill you on contact with the ground. Oh, aliens are invading Earth? No matter what game you are playing, from Halo, to Gears of War, to Resistance, to Mass Effect, you are somehow the only person in the entire squad that can save the world. It’s absolutely preposterous! Of the thousands of marines in a single-player Call of Duty campaign, you’re the only one that manages to get anything done.

Why is it that things only occur because you cause them to occur, why do things occur only because you’re in the area, and why have those tropes been going on for so long? Is it a simple case of ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it?’ In all of the advances we’ve made over the years in the whole of gaming, this one thing, this one seemingly minute thing, has stayed constant.

Nude Link

Editors Note: Dustin is an asshole.

Let’s be honest, being the hero is fun, but it is an overused concept at this point. Sure, it worked for a few decades. I can see why this element, this ability to be a badass in a given virtual world, is so very popular. Be please, gaming world! We need innovation! We need something, at the very core of what a game is, to be ultimately different than what we have right now. Stagnation will occur otherwise, and that’s not good in any industry, especially the one we all partake in.

I for one, desire change. I desire a game where things occur in the background and affect your single-player experience. I want a game where key events happen during a single-player campaign without me causing them to happen. I want to play a first-person shooter where I’m not a gun-toting, bro-fisting badass, but rather I’m the medic healing him every so often. I want more of that support role, that secondary role, that backseat to the main protagonist. How about a mission-based game, where I’m the one doing research on whatever missions the main character gets, and give them to him or her myself? Why not a platformer where twenty other people are going along the same quest I am? I want to get to the end of a game and find I’m one of thousands all achieving the same goal. Give me an RPG where I’m clearing out dungeons for someone else to get the great items inside, to the fight a greater evil.

I don’t want to feel special. I don’t want to feel important. I don’t want to get pat on the back. Gaming has grown boring and more importantly, over the course of forty years, has become outright stagnant. Being the world’s savior, the only one who can kill the head of a country, the one who can liberate an opressed population, it’s no longer appealing to me.

I don’t want to be the hero anymore.

[Written by contributor Frank Falcone]

The following two tabs change content below.
Contributors are the blood of Geekenstein. Do you think you have what it takes to become a full-fledged staff member or just want to get your opinion noticed? Send an email to contributor@geekenstein.com for more info on how you can get your content published on Geekenstein!

Latest posts by Geekenstein Contributor (see all)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Around the web
  • http://twitter.com/shanepeltzer Shane Peltzer

    Fantastic article man! I feel the same way and I was just having a discussion about this with a friend the other day. I want to feel like someone who can help solve a problem rather than be the only person in the entire world who sets everything into motion and who is also the only person who can save the world too.

  • http://twitter.com/Xx334xX Terrence B.

    In the end video games have the “hero complex” that is associated with the fantasy of doing stuff we can’t do in real life. Thats the appeal video games have for people though I do appreciate when this cycle is broken up here and there. Nice article Frank.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.s.connor Dan Singe Connor

    Just before I get started. Dynasty Warriors Empires is what you’re looking for, you can opt out of being the leader and instead just be a subordinate, you can even opt to just be a early era mercenary, fighting whatever fight you feel like fighting. territories are won and lost, officers are rescued, captured and killed by more than your own hand. the entire game dynamically plays as if every officer role is being played by another human.

    The Battlefront series done the same, you, as the playable character had a defining role in the outcome of the battle, but no more so than every other NPC could have had.

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.s.connor Dan Singe Connor

    I’m so tired, I’m working in 6 hours. I’ll make my point later. Great article though, man. Mucho props ;)

  • http://www.facebook.com/dan.s.connor Dan Singe Connor

    Also, Crusader Kings 2, that game goes to extreme lengths to show that you are just a cog in the mechanism.

  • Lee Jerry

    CK2 is glitchy and has lots of cheap tricks only against players though. For example, imprisoned NPC can still assassinate your character with plots, but if you’re prisoner you cannot do such things. Also factions appear more frequent in player’s countries just to slow down progress. And assassinate events may happen “continuously” due to glitch.

  • Guest

    You ever diss my Halo again i will find you…..